Page actions
field guide / candidate
Outreach rules — qualification
The distinct qualification record for Outreach rules. This page is proposal-only.
Record status
- Record ID
- field-guide:outreach-rules
- Parent lifecycle
- candidate
- Page lane
- docs_urls
- Lane lifecycle
- proposed
- Owner
- Wick
- Owner role
- Not separately recorded
- Owner status
- Not separately recorded
- Qualification result
- NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review
Working browser surface: Field guides — documentation — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.
Qualification status
- Result
- NOT RUN
- Disposition
- HELD
- Reviewer
- Not recorded
- Receipt
- Not recorded
This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_urls lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.
Lane-specific instrument aids
No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane.
Outcome definitions
- Verified
- All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
- Failed
- One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
- Needs review
- Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
- Held
- Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.
The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.
Proposed deterministic acceptance tests
Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.
- Every documentation route has a distinct purpose and contains content not duplicated from the overview.
- The overview identifies the five related jobs: World-post research, Outreach dossiers, Message drafts, Response triage, and Campaign chronology.
- Each workflow record displays a canonical ID or linked source record, lifecycle, provenance, and revision state where applicable.
- A message draft can be prepared and reviewed without exposing a send control that implies external delivery.
- Approval states are visibly limited to Needs review, Approved, and Held, with a receipt or decision note.
- A response can be triaged into a separate record and linked back to the dossier and chronology without overwriting source evidence.
- A follow-up to-do requires owner, priority, due date or explicit undated state, and held reason when blocked.
- Private, public, and held records are visibly partitioned in search and documentation links.
- Keyboard navigation, visible focus, labelled form controls, readable error messages, and non-color-only status indicators are present on every proposed form.
- Invalid or incomplete records fail safely with a clear message and remain in Needs review or Held state.
- Agent Logs expose Wick's current work and authority boundary without claiming production execution.
- No page claims provider connection, credentials, database authority, customer indexing, publication, deployment, or successful external send.
Negative and held-state tests
- Treating a named related job or native surface as proof of a connected production workflow.
- Inventing recipients, responses, dates, provider data, customer records, or campaign outcomes.
- Duplicating one generic page across many URLs without distinct search value.
- Allowing a draft, approval, or triage record to imply an external send or customer-visible change.
- Losing provenance, source locators, revisions, or chronology ordering during edits.
- Using deadlines as hidden automation instead of explicit human-review signals.
- Exposing private dossiers or held records through public documentation or broad search.
- Overstating qualification when evidence is incomplete or unverified.
- Accessibility failures in status labels, focus order, validation, or keyboard-only use.
Qualification claim boundary
Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence
- This is a proposed source-backed field guide for organizing outreach-related records and review steps.
- The guide relates to World-post research, Outreach dossiers, Message drafts, Response triage, and Campaign chronology.
- The documented app surfaces are local prototypes or indexes with the stated capabilities and boundaries.
- Message preparation, review states, deadlines, provenance, and chronology can be specified as proposed record behavior.
- The allowed verified-instrument directory was reviewed for this proposal and no instrument is designated.
Still held
- Any claim that outreach messages are sent or delivered.
- Any claim of provider, credential, database, customer, calendar, or publication connection.
- Any claim that Wick or another Agent executed external outreach.
- Any claim of customer indexing, production deployment, or live campaign status.
- Any claim that a response was received unless represented by a separately verified source record.
- Any claim that an item is qualified, approved for external use, or legally or policy compliant without explicit human review and evidence.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
source_record:field-guide:outreach-rulesagents/index.html#wickobserved_native_contract:project_and_field_guide_collectionsobserved_native_contract:deadlinesobserved_native_contract:recordsobserved_native_contract:pointguardapp_route:/app/notebook/field-guides/app_route:/app/notebook/messages/app_route:/app/notebook/approvals/app_route:/app/notebook/to-dos/app_route:/app/notebook/agent-logs/