Page actions
instrument / verified-clean
Cron Expression Explainer
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
Inspectable records
Ledger state
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
- Area
- Computing & Information
- Tranche
- tranche-6
- Evidence ID
- t6-022
- Ledger rows
- 1
No ledger note is attached.
Review findings
The stated parsing and forward-scan concepts are standard, but the instrument is not fully verifiable until the cron dialect, starting instant semantics, calendar semantics, timezone/DST behavior, and invalid-expression behavior are made explicit.
Formula and scope findings
- The field-by-field parsing approach is standard, but the specification does not define which 6-field dialect is used: seconds-first Quartz style, seconds-last, or a year field.
- The specification does not define the standard used for simultaneous day-of-month and day-of-week restrictions. Traditional Vixie/POSIX cron commonly uses OR semantics, while some implementations use AND semantics.
- The forward date-scan requires an explicit starting instant and whether a run exactly at that instant is included or excluded; neither is specified.
- The specification does not define handling for Sunday as 0, 7, or both, nor the accepted month/day names and ranges.
- The specification does not define behavior for impossible schedules, invalid expressions, or a nonpositive next-run count.
Unit assumptions
- All timestamps in these vectors are ISO 8601 UTC timestamps with a trailing Z; the timezone is UTC, so no daylight-saving transition occurs.
- Five-field vectors use standard Vixie/POSIX field order: minute hour day-of-month month day-of-week.
- For five-field vectors, the next-run search is strictly after the supplied start timestamp.
- The six-field vector explicitly uses Quartz-style seconds-first order: second minute hour day-of-month month day-of-week.
- Cron fields represent wall-clock calendar fields; timezone and daylight-saving behavior must be defined by the implementation.
Boundary hardening
BREAK_CLAIMED · SELF_FLAGGED
The specification leaves critical edge behavior undefined: an unsafe next-run count can cause precision loss or resource exhaustion, day-of-month/day-of-week matching has competing OR and AND interpretations, and repeated daylight-saving local times can yield different timestamps or run counts.
Errata and corrections
No applied erratum is attached to this unique-name record.
Inspectable example
4 review vectors are recorded. One source-bound sample is shown below.
{
"inputs": {
"expression": "*/15 9-17 * * 1-5",
"dialect": "Vixie/POSIX 5-field",
"timezone": "UTC",
"start_timestamp": "2025-03-10T09:07:00Z",
"next_count": 4
},
"expected_outputs": {
"plain_english": "Every 15 minutes from 09:00 through 17:59, Monday through Friday.",
"next_run_timestamps": [
"2025-03-10T09:15:00Z",
"2025-03-10T09:30:00Z",
"2025-03-10T09:45:00Z",
"2025-03-10T10:00:00Z"
]
},
"working": "2025-03-10 is Monday, so the weekday field matches. The hour range 9-17 includes 09:00 through 17:59. The minute step */15 produces minutes 0, 15, 30, 45. Starting strictly after 09:07, the first matching minute is 15: 09:15. Adding 15 minutes gives 09:30, then 09:45, then 10:00. Therefore the four outputs are 09:15, 09:30, 09:45, and 10:00 UTC."
}Related workflows
No source-defined multi-instrument workflow membership is recorded.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
VERIFIED_LEDGER.json · VERIFIED_CLEANevidence-tranche6/tranche6-results.jsonBOUNDARY_HAZARD_CATALOG.json