Page actions
instrument / verified-clean
Electric Potential (Point Charges) Calculator
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
Inspectable records
Ledger state
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
- Area
- Physics — Kinematics/Projectiles/Orbits, Forces/Energy/Momentum, Rotational Dynamics, Gravitation, Oscillations/Waves, Optics, E&M Fields, Relativity, Quantum, Statistical Thermo
- Tranche
- tranche-5
- Evidence ID
- t5-180
- Ledger rows
- 1
No ledger note is attached.
Review findings
The pair formulas are standard under the stated SI, vacuum, point-charge, and infinite-reference assumptions. The catalog claim is ambiguous because it says potential due to point charges plural while listing only the single-charge expression, and it does not specify how multiple-charge inputs are represented or whether U is for one pair or a complete charge system.
Formula and scope findings
- V=kq/r is correct for the potential from one point charge, but the stated capability covers multiple point charges and requires V_total=Σ(kq_i/r_i). The spec does not define whether V means a single-source potential or the summed potential.
- U=kq1q2/r is the standard electrostatic potential energy for one pair of point charges, but total potential energy for multiple charges requires summing kq_iq_j/r_ij over all distinct pairs.
- The formulas assume a homogeneous vacuum or that k already includes the medium's permittivity; the medium is not specified.
Unit assumptions
- Use SI units: charge in coulombs, distance in meters, potential in volts, and energy in joules.
- For vacuum, use k=8.99×10^9 N·m²/C². In a material medium, k must be replaced by 1/(4πε) or an explicitly supplied equivalent.
- Charges are signed quantities; positive and negative signs determine the sign of V and U.
- Potential is referenced to zero at infinite distance.
- For U, r is the separation between the two charges, not each charge's distance from an observation point.
Boundary hardening
BREAK_CLAIMED · SELF_FLAGGED
The formula has an undefined zero-distance case, so the instrument must reject r=0 rather than perform plain division. The specification also leaves distance-sign conventions unstated and has no actual piecewise formula branch.
Errata and corrections
No applied erratum is attached to this unique-name record.
Inspectable example
4 review vectors are recorded. One source-bound sample is shown below.
{
"inputs": {
"k_N_m2_per_C2": 8990000000,
"q_C": 0.000002,
"r_m": 0.3,
"q1_C": 0.000002,
"q2_C": -0.000003,
"pair_distance_m": 0.5
},
"expected_outputs": {
"V_V": 59933.333333333336,
"U_J": -0.10788
},
"working": "V=(8.99×10^9)(2×10^-6)/0.30=(17980)/0.30=59933.333333333336 V. U=(8.99×10^9)(2×10^-6)(-3×10^-6)/0.50=(8.99×10^9)(-6×10^-12)/0.50=(-0.05394)/0.50=-0.10788 J."
}Related workflows
No source-defined multi-instrument workflow membership is recorded.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
VERIFIED_LEDGER.json · VERIFIED_CLEANevidence-tranche5/tranche5-results.jsonBOUNDARY_HAZARD_CATALOG.json