Page actions
instrument / verified-clean
Filter Designer — RC Low-Pass/High-Pass
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
Inspectable records
Ledger state
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
- Area
- Electrical & Electronics Engineering — Circuits, Power Systems, Electronics Lab
- Tranche
- tranche-5
- Evidence ID
- t5-028
- Ledger rows
- 1
No ledger note is attached.
Review findings
The core cutoff formula is correct under the ideal first-order RC assumption, but the specification needs explicit inverse formulas, input units, positivity constraints, topology/transfer-function definitions, and an honest label stating that results are nominal ideal values rather than guaranteed measured cutoffs.
Formula and scope findings
- fc=1/(2πRC) is the standard ideal first-order RC cutoff formula for both low-pass and high-pass filters, but the specification does not explicitly provide the inverse formulas R=1/(2πfcC) and C=1/(2πfcR) required for the claimed component-value calculation.
- The stated −3 dB output is valid only for an ideal single-pole RC network when measured relative to the passband gain; source impedance, load impedance, parasitic capacitance, and non-ideal component behavior are not addressed.
- The topology is ambiguous: low-pass and high-pass filters share the same cutoff-frequency formula, but their transfer functions and passband references differ.
Unit assumptions
- R must be entered in ohms, C in farads, and fc in hertz before applying the formula.
- The factor 2π converts angular frequency to ordinary frequency in hertz.
- All component values are positive real quantities.
- The circuit is assumed to be an ideal first-order RC network with negligible source and load impedance.
Boundary hardening
BREAK_CLAIMED · SELF_FLAGGED
The zero-resistance input produces an undefined cutoff and must be rejected; additionally, unspecified component units can produce a 1,000,000-fold cutoff-frequency discrepancy.
Errata and corrections
No applied erratum is attached to this unique-name record.
Inspectable example
4 review vectors are recorded. One source-bound sample is shown below.
{
"inputs": {
"topology": "low-pass",
"R_ohm": 10000,
"C_F": 1e-8
},
"expected_outputs": {
"fc_Hz": 1591.54943,
"minus_3dB_frequency_Hz": 1591.54943
},
"working": "C=10 nF=10×10^-9 F=1×10^-8 F. RC=10000×1×10^-8=1×10^-4 s. 2πRC=2π×1×10^-4=0.00062831853. fc=1/0.00062831853=1591.54943 Hz. For an ideal first-order low-pass, the −3 dB frequency equals fc."
}Related workflows
No source-defined multi-instrument workflow membership is recorded.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
VERIFIED_LEDGER.json · VERIFIED_CLEANevidence-tranche5/tranche5-results.jsonBOUNDARY_HAZARD_CATALOG.json