Page actions
instrument mechanism / verified-clean
Phase Diagram Lever Rule Calculator mechanism
The inspectable method record for Phase Diagram Lever Rule Calculator, kept separate from implementation and qualification.
Model scope
The arithmetic method is standard and valid after selecting a valid two-phase equilibrium tie line. The specification needs separate α+liquid and α+β formulas, explicit phase-field selection, composition basis, interpolation rules, boundary handling, and a defined convention for invariant points before it can receive PASS.
- The stated formula fraction_α=(C_L-C_0)/(C_L-C_α) is correct only for an α+liquid two-phase field, with all compositions expressed on the same basis and C_α≤C_0≤C_L.
- The specification also claims α/β calculations, but the formula uses C_L and does not define the β fraction. For an α+β field, the required formula is fraction_α=(C_β-C_0)/(C_β-C_α), with fraction_β=(C_0-C_α)/(C_β-C_α).
- The temperature is not used directly by the arithmetic; it must select a valid equilibrium tie line from the phase-diagram dataset. The spec does not define interpolation, phase-field validation, or behavior at invariant points such as the eutectic.
- The requested tie-line diagram overlay cannot be verified from the stated arithmetic alone; plotting coordinates, axes, composition basis, and temperature-axis units must be specified.
Units and conventions
- All compositions in these vectors are weight percent Sn, wt% Sn, on a Pb-Sn binary alloy basis; C0, Cα, and Cβ must use the same composition basis.
- Temperature is in degrees Celsius and selects the Pb-Sn eutectic tie-line. The tabulated eutectic values are used as the limiting α+β tie line just below the eutectic temperature.
- Phase fractions are dimensionless mass fractions and must sum to 1.0.
- The vectors exercise the α+β form of the lever rule, not the α+liquid form written in the specification.
Inspectable vector
One of 4 source-bound review vectors:
{
"inputs": {
"system": "Pb-Sn",
"temperature_C": 182.99,
"overall_composition_wt_percent_Sn": 61.9,
"phase_field": "alpha+beta",
"C_alpha_wt_percent_Sn": 18.3,
"C_beta_wt_percent_Sn": 97.8
},
"expected_outputs": {
"phase_fractions": {
"alpha": 0.451572327,
"beta": 0.548427673
},
"sum": 1
},
"reference_data": {
"eutectic_temperature_C": 183,
"eutectic_composition_wt_percent_Sn": 61.9,
"C_alpha_wt_percent_Sn_at_eutectic": 18.3,
"C_beta_wt_percent_Sn_at_eutectic": 97.8,
"source_convention": "Widely tabulated standard value; ASM Alloy Phase Diagrams textbook compilation"
},
"working": "Use the α+β lever rule. Denominator = Cβ − Cα = 97.8 − 18.3 = 79.5 wt% Sn. Alpha fraction = (Cβ − C0)/(Cβ − Cα) = (97.8 − 61.9)/79.5 = 35.9/79.5 = 359/795 = 0.451572327. Beta fraction = (C0 − Cα)/(Cβ − Cα) = (61.9 − 18.3)/79.5 = 43.6/79.5 = 436/795 = 0.548427673. Check: 0.451572327 + 0.548427673 = 1.000000000."
}Failure boundary
BREAK_CLAIMED · SELF_FLAGGED
The formula produces an undefined 0/0 result when C_L equals C_alpha, and naive application outside the two-phase interval produces nonphysical fractions below zero or above one. Reversing endpoint or composition-axis conventions can also silently swap phase labels.
Other records
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
VERIFIED_LEDGER.jsonevidence-tranche7/tranche7-results.jsonBOUNDARY_HAZARD_CATALOG.json