Page actions
instrument / verified-clean
Population Growth: Exponential Model
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
Inspectable records
Ledger state
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
- Area
- Biology, Medicine & Pharmacology (educational estimates only — every panel labeled not-medical-advice)
- Tranche
- tranche-6
- Evidence ID
- t6-029
- Ledger rows
- 1
No ledger note is attached.
Review findings
The model is mathematically standard for idealized unconstrained growth and the stated educational, not-medical-advice label is appropriate. NEEDS_REVIEW is required because the exact units of r and time, the plotted time domain, and the behavior and labeling of doubling time for r<=0 are unspecified.
Formula and scope findings
- N(t)=N0·e^(rt) is the standard unconstrained continuous exponential-growth model.
- The specification does not state the doubling-time formula. For r>0 it should be Td=ln(2)/r; for r=0 it is infinite/undefined, and for r<0 the population has a halving time ln(2)/|r| rather than a positive doubling time.
- The valid input domain and interpretation are not stated: normally N0>=0, t>=0 for forward prediction, and r may be positive, zero, or negative.
Unit assumptions
- r must have inverse-time units and t must use the matching time unit, so rt is dimensionless.
- N0 and N(t) are population counts or consistently scaled population measures; they have the same units.
- Doubling-time output has the same time unit as t.
- The unit of r and time is ambiguous in the specification; this must be explicit in the interface and plot labels.
Boundary hardening
BREAK_CLAIMED · SELF_FLAGGED
The zero-growth input r=0 makes the requested doubling-time output undefined, so the instrument must reject it or explicitly display infinity/undefined. The specification also leaves unit conventions unenforced, allowing materially different population estimates from the same numeric inputs.
Errata and corrections
No applied erratum is attached to this unique-name record.
Inspectable example
4 review vectors are recorded. One source-bound sample is shown below.
{
"inputs": {
"N0": 1000,
"r": 0.02,
"r_unit": "per year",
"sample_times": [
0,
10,
20
],
"time_unit": "years"
},
"expected_outputs": {
"sampled_population": {
"t=0": 1000,
"t=10": 1221.402758,
"t=20": 1491.824698
},
"doubling_time_years": 34.65735903,
"curve_features": {
"roots": [],
"finite_extrema": [],
"horizontal_asymptote": "N=0 as t approaches negative infinity",
"initial_value": "N(0)=1000"
}
},
"working": "N(0)=1000·e^(0.02·0)=1000·e^0=1000. N(10)=1000·e^(0.2)=1000·1.221402758=1221.402758. N(20)=1000·e^(0.4)=1000·1.491824698=1491.824698. Doubling time=ln(2)/0.02=0.6931471806/0.02=34.65735903 years. Since N0>0 and r>0, there are no roots or finite extrema; the horizontal asymptote is N=0 for t approaching negative infinity."
}Related workflows
No source-defined multi-instrument workflow membership is recorded.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
VERIFIED_LEDGER.json · VERIFIED_CLEANevidence-tranche6/tranche6-results.jsonBOUNDARY_HAZARD_CATALOG.json