Page actions
instrument / verified-clean
Shallow-Water Wave Speed & Breaking Depth
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
Inspectable records
Ledger state
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
- Area
- Earth & Space (astronomy, orbital mechanics, meteorology, geology, geodesy, oceanography)
- Tranche
- tranche-5
- Evidence ID
- t5-135
- Ledger rows
- 1
No ledger note is attached.
Review findings
The formulas are acceptable simplified approximations under explicit SI-unit and physical-domain constraints, but the specification needs review to define units, validate nonnegative inputs, state the shallow-water applicability condition, and clarify whether H is local wave height or incoming/offshore height. The honest simplified-linear-theory label is appropriate but should also mention the empirical 0.78 breaker-index limitation.
Formula and scope findings
- c=√(gd) is the standard non-dispersive shallow-water wave-speed formula, but it is valid only when the water is sufficiently shallow relative to wavelength and assumes no significant current or other corrections.
- H/d≈0.78 is an empirical breaker-index rule of thumb, not a universal breaking law. The estimated breaking depth requires d_break≈H/0.78, but the spec does not explicitly state this rearrangement.
- The meaning of incoming wave height is ambiguous: using offshore incident height directly as H ignores shoaling, refraction, dissipation, and local wave-height transformation before breaking.
Unit assumptions
- Water depth d and wave height H are assumed to be in metres.
- Wave speed is reported in metres per second and estimated breaking depth in metres.
- Gravity is assumed to be g=9.81 m/s².
- The breaking criterion uses wave height H and local depth d in the same length units.
- The centimetre test case must be converted to metres before applying either formula.
Boundary hardening
BREAK_CLAIMED · SELF_FLAGGED
The specification does not define validation for zero depth, so the division H/d can become undefined. It also leaves wave-height convention and unit handling unspecified, allowing materially different breaking-depth results.
Errata and corrections
No applied erratum is attached to this unique-name record.
Inspectable example
4 review vectors are recorded. One source-bound sample is shown below.
{
"inputs": {
"water_depth_m": 4,
"incoming_wave_height_m": 1.2
},
"expected_outputs": {
"wave_speed_m_per_s": 6.264184,
"estimated_breaking_depth_m": 1.538462
},
"working": "c=√(gd)=√(9.81×4)=√39.24=6.264184 m/s. Breaking criterion H/d=0.78 gives d_break=H/0.78=1.2/0.78=1.538462 m."
}Related workflows
No source-defined multi-instrument workflow membership is recorded.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
VERIFIED_LEDGER.json · VERIFIED_CLEANevidence-tranche5/tranche5-results.jsonBOUNDARY_HAZARD_CATALOG.json