Page actions
job / candidate
Study records — qualification
The distinct qualification record for Study records. This page is proposal-only.
Record status
- Record ID
- job:socrates:study-records
- Parent lifecycle
- candidate
- Page lane
- qualification
- Lane lifecycle
- proposed
- Owner
- Socrates
- Owner role
- University guide and tutor entity
- Owner status
- PROPOSED
- Qualification result
- NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review
Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.
Qualification status
- Result
- NOT RUN
- Disposition
- HELD
- Reviewer
- Not recorded
- Receipt
- Not recorded
This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.
Lane-specific instrument aids
No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane.
Outcome definitions
- Verified
- All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
- Failed
- One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
- Needs review
- Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
- Held
- Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.
The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.
Proposed deterministic acceptance tests
Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.
- Qualification passes only when the record has a canonical ID, proposed owner, bounded question, learning objective, visibility state, and human-review state.
- Qualification passes only when every claim links to at least one supplied or user-provided source record, or is explicitly labelled unsupported, uncertain, or unresolved.
- A source with no locator, provenance, or inspectable content cannot support a qualified claim; the claim is Held or marked unsupported.
- A disputed source or claim is visibly labelled disputed and remains in the comparison set; it cannot be presented as settled fact.
- A request to invent a primary source, citation, quotation, or publication date fails and produces a Held state with an explanatory receipt.
- A request to conceal conflicting evidence fails and leaves the conflicting evidence visible to the reviewer.
- A record containing student identity data beyond the minimum fields fails privacy review unless explicit retention consent and restricted visibility are recorded.
- Sensitive student details are excluded from search indexing and public-facing contexts; no customer or public index is assumed or claimed.
- High-stakes instruction requests fail automatic qualification and require human review; tutoring language must not imply professional, institutional, or grading authority.
- External enrollment, provider writes, publication, customer effects, and database authority remain Held regardless of requested action or named interface.
- The ordered path must be acyclic: every dependency refers to an existing step, and a cycle produces a deterministic chronology failure.
- Due dates must be valid calendar values; a dependent step cannot be due before its prerequisite unless an explicit reviewed exception exists.
- Revisions preserve prior values, source references, and reviewer receipts; overwriting evidence without a revision record fails chronology and provenance review.
- Keyboard-only users can reach every field, expand source evidence, inspect uncertainty labels, change visibility, and submit for review.
- Every field has a programmatic label, errors are text-identifiable and adjacent to the relevant field, focus moves to the first blocking error, and status is not conveyed by color alone.
- Contrast and text alternatives meet the designated accessibility review requirement; no image or visual comparison is required for qualification.
- A missing source, owner, consent state, reviewer, deadline rule, or authority rationale produces a deterministic Held state rather than a partial qualification.
- Search results respect visibility partitions and show source labels, lifecycle, and review state; private or Held records are not presented as public or qualified.
- The final receipt records inputs, source locators, claims reviewed, chronology result, privacy result, authority result, accessibility result, failures, reviewer, and proposal status.
Negative and held-state tests
- Socrates may be mistaken for a university, instructor of record, accrediting body, or curriculum authority.
- Named skills and native surfaces are proposals or prototypes and do not prove connected web features or deployment.
- Student identity, enrollment, grades, disability information, or other sensitive data could be retained or indexed unnecessarily.
- A polished learning path could disguise unsupported claims, disputed evidence, or missing prerequisites.
- Copied or paraphrased material could lose provenance, licensing context, source date, or revision history.
- Deadlines may be interpreted as official course deadlines when they are only local planning dates.
- High-stakes academic, medical, legal, financial, or safety instruction may exceed bounded tutoring authority.
- External messages, enrollment, publication, credentialing, or customer-facing effects could be inferred from draft surfaces.
- A source comparison may create false equivalence by treating all sources as equally authoritative without an explicit rationale.
- Accessibility failures could prevent keyboard, screen-reader, low-vision, or cognitive-access users from inspecting uncertainty and review state.
Qualification claim boundary
Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence
- This is a proposal for qualification of a Socrates study-record job.
- The package defines bounded tutoring, source comparison, inspectable claims, learning paths, privacy controls, and human review.
- The observed contract includes local Notebook and PointGuard surfaces with held external effects.
- The supplied source record identifies Socrates as proposed and names its gates and never-rules.
Still held
- Socrates is deployed, connected, or production-ready.
- Socrates is a university, accredited tutor, instructor of record, or authoritative curriculum publisher.
- Any provider, credential, enrollment, database, customer index, publication, or external message effect exists.
- A study record is qualified merely because a native surface or named skill exists.
- Any source, claim, deadline, course route, or curriculum statement is verified without an inspectable supplied record.
- Student identity data is safely stored, indexed, or shared.
- This package provides high-stakes instruction or official academic advice.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
agents/index.html#socratessource_record:job:socrates:study-recordsjob:socrates:study-records:qualificationObserved native contract: Notebook records, deadlines, PointGuard, and held web boundaryObserved app routes: /app/notebook/notes/, /app/notebook/files/, /app/notebook/to-dos/, /app/notebook/field-guides/, /app/notebook/approvals/, /app/notebook/agent-logs/, /app/notebook/search/