Guth
NewsDocs
Page actions
View as Markdown ↗
Explore MCP tools ↗

job / candidate

Study records — qualification

The distinct qualification record for Study records. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID
job:socrates:study-records
Parent lifecycle
candidate
Page lane
qualification
Lane lifecycle
proposed
Owner
Socrates
Owner role
University guide and tutor entity
Owner status
PROPOSED
Qualification result
NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result
NOT RUN
Disposition
HELD
Reviewer
Not recorded
Receipt
Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Lane-specific instrument aids

No verified instrument is assigned to this qualification lane.

Outcome definitions

Verified
All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.
Failed
One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.
Needs review
Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.
Held
Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Proposed deterministic acceptance tests

Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.

  • Qualification passes only when the record has a canonical ID, proposed owner, bounded question, learning objective, visibility state, and human-review state.
  • Qualification passes only when every claim links to at least one supplied or user-provided source record, or is explicitly labelled unsupported, uncertain, or unresolved.
  • A source with no locator, provenance, or inspectable content cannot support a qualified claim; the claim is Held or marked unsupported.
  • A disputed source or claim is visibly labelled disputed and remains in the comparison set; it cannot be presented as settled fact.
  • A request to invent a primary source, citation, quotation, or publication date fails and produces a Held state with an explanatory receipt.
  • A request to conceal conflicting evidence fails and leaves the conflicting evidence visible to the reviewer.
  • A record containing student identity data beyond the minimum fields fails privacy review unless explicit retention consent and restricted visibility are recorded.
  • Sensitive student details are excluded from search indexing and public-facing contexts; no customer or public index is assumed or claimed.
  • High-stakes instruction requests fail automatic qualification and require human review; tutoring language must not imply professional, institutional, or grading authority.
  • External enrollment, provider writes, publication, customer effects, and database authority remain Held regardless of requested action or named interface.
  • The ordered path must be acyclic: every dependency refers to an existing step, and a cycle produces a deterministic chronology failure.
  • Due dates must be valid calendar values; a dependent step cannot be due before its prerequisite unless an explicit reviewed exception exists.
  • Revisions preserve prior values, source references, and reviewer receipts; overwriting evidence without a revision record fails chronology and provenance review.
  • Keyboard-only users can reach every field, expand source evidence, inspect uncertainty labels, change visibility, and submit for review.
  • Every field has a programmatic label, errors are text-identifiable and adjacent to the relevant field, focus moves to the first blocking error, and status is not conveyed by color alone.
  • Contrast and text alternatives meet the designated accessibility review requirement; no image or visual comparison is required for qualification.
  • A missing source, owner, consent state, reviewer, deadline rule, or authority rationale produces a deterministic Held state rather than a partial qualification.
  • Search results respect visibility partitions and show source labels, lifecycle, and review state; private or Held records are not presented as public or qualified.
  • The final receipt records inputs, source locators, claims reviewed, chronology result, privacy result, authority result, accessibility result, failures, reviewer, and proposal status.

Negative and held-state tests

  • Socrates may be mistaken for a university, instructor of record, accrediting body, or curriculum authority.
  • Named skills and native surfaces are proposals or prototypes and do not prove connected web features or deployment.
  • Student identity, enrollment, grades, disability information, or other sensitive data could be retained or indexed unnecessarily.
  • A polished learning path could disguise unsupported claims, disputed evidence, or missing prerequisites.
  • Copied or paraphrased material could lose provenance, licensing context, source date, or revision history.
  • Deadlines may be interpreted as official course deadlines when they are only local planning dates.
  • High-stakes academic, medical, legal, financial, or safety instruction may exceed bounded tutoring authority.
  • External messages, enrollment, publication, credentialing, or customer-facing effects could be inferred from draft surfaces.
  • A source comparison may create false equivalence by treating all sources as equally authoritative without an explicit rationale.
  • Accessibility failures could prevent keyboard, screen-reader, low-vision, or cognitive-access users from inspecting uncertainty and review state.

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence

  • This is a proposal for qualification of a Socrates study-record job.
  • The package defines bounded tutoring, source comparison, inspectable claims, learning paths, privacy controls, and human review.
  • The observed contract includes local Notebook and PointGuard surfaces with held external effects.
  • The supplied source record identifies Socrates as proposed and names its gates and never-rules.

Still held

  • Socrates is deployed, connected, or production-ready.
  • Socrates is a university, accredited tutor, instructor of record, or authoritative curriculum publisher.
  • Any provider, credential, enrollment, database, customer index, publication, or external message effect exists.
  • A study record is qualified merely because a native surface or named skill exists.
  • Any source, claim, deadline, course route, or curriculum statement is verified without an inspectable supplied record.
  • Student identity data is safely stored, indexed, or shared.
  • This package provides high-stakes instruction or official academic advice.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

  • agents/index.html#socrates
  • source_record:job:socrates:study-records
  • job:socrates:study-records:qualification
  • Observed native contract: Notebook records, deadlines, PointGuard, and held web boundary
  • Observed app routes: /app/notebook/notes/, /app/notebook/files/, /app/notebook/to-dos/, /app/notebook/field-guides/, /app/notebook/approvals/, /app/notebook/agent-logs/, /app/notebook/search/