Guth
NewsDocs
Page actions
View as Markdown ↗
Explore MCP tools ↗

job / candidate

Uncertainty marking — forms

The distinct forms record for Uncertainty marking. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID
job:socrates:uncertainty-marking
Parent lifecycle
candidate
Page lane
package
Lane lifecycle
proposed
Owner
Socrates
Owner role
University guide and tutor entity
Owner status
PROPOSED
Qualification result
NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Proposed form sections

Each section is a candidate schema for inspectable records. Required-field presence does not establish factual truth.

Question and learning goal

Define the inquiry without presupposing an answer.

  • question_text
  • learning_goal
  • audience_level
  • subject_area
  • scope_inclusions
  • scope_exclusions

Evidence and sources

Capture inspectable source context and prevent unsupported attribution.

  • source_title
  • source_author_or_institution
  • source_locator
  • source_type
  • source_date
  • source_reference_or_file_link
  • source_sha256_if_available
  • quoted_or_paraphrased_passage
  • access_notes

Claim register

Separate facts, interpretations, hypotheses, and unresolved disputes.

  • claim_text
  • claim_category
  • confidence_label
  • supporting_source_ids
  • contradicting_source_ids
  • assumptions
  • known_limitations
  • last_reviewed_at

Comparison and synthesis

Make agreement, disagreement, and missing evidence visible.

  • comparison_basis
  • areas_of_agreement
  • areas_of_disagreement
  • method_or_definition_differences
  • missing_evidence
  • provisional_synthesis
  • alternative_interpretations

Learning path and review

Turn the inquiry into bounded, reviewable work.

  • ordered_learning_steps
  • prerequisites
  • learner_checks
  • review_owner
  • review_due_at
  • escalation_reason
  • approval_state

Accessible state contract

  • Every field requires a visible and programmatic label.
  • Required and optional fields must be stated in text.
  • Invalid entries require an actionable message linked to the field.
  • Blocked and Held states remain visible without relying on color alone.

Supporting documentation fields

These fields come from the docs_urls lane and remain separate from the primary operating form.

Question and learning context

Define what the learner is trying to understand without assuming authority or filling gaps with invented facts.

  • question_text
  • learning_goal
  • course_or_topic_context
  • learner_level
  • known_constraints
  • desired_output_type

Sources and evidence

Capture inspectable source material and preserve provenance for later review.

  • source_title
  • source_type
  • source_locator
  • source_excerpt_or_summary
  • source_date_if_known
  • source_sha256_if_available
  • provenance_note
  • source_status

Claim and uncertainty marking

Separate claims from evidence and make disagreement, limitations, and unknowns visible.

  • claim_text
  • claim_scope
  • uncertainty_label
  • supporting_source_ids
  • contradicting_source_ids
  • reason_for_label
  • missing_evidence
  • last_reviewed_at

Learning path

Turn the inquiry into bounded, ordered steps with checks for understanding.

  • step_title
  • step_purpose
  • prerequisites
  • activity
  • expected_artifact
  • completion_condition
  • reviewer_or_owner

Boundary and review

Identify gates before material is treated as instruction, curriculum, or consequential advice.

  • high_stakes_flag
  • student_identity_data_present
  • external_enrollment_requested
  • published_curriculum_claim
  • human_review_required
  • approval_status
  • held_reason

Required or proposed record references

No record existence is asserted by this documentation page.

  • source-labelled notes for claims and evidence
  • file references for source materials
  • project record for the learning path
  • to-dos for review deadlines and unresolved questions
  • approval record for high-stakes or publishable claims
  • agent log recording authority, proposed actions, and receipts
  • canonical job record with owner_agent, owner_role, lifecycle, gates, and never rules
  • question note with learner wording and scope
  • source-labelled note for each supplied source or evidence item
  • claim record with confidence or uncertainty label and rationale
  • comparison record linking claims to sources
  • field-guide or project record for the learning path
  • todo records for review checkpoints
  • approval record for high-stakes or publication-sensitive output
  • agent-log record containing proposed work, authority boundary, and receipt

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

  • agents/index.html#socrates
  • source_record:job:socrates:uncertainty-marking
  • observed_native_contract.project_and_field_guide_collections
  • observed_native_contract.deadlines
  • observed_native_contract.records
  • observed_native_contract.pointguard
  • app_routes:/app/pointguard/
  • app_routes:/app/notebook/notes/
  • app_routes:/app/notebook/files/
  • app_routes:/app/notebook/to-dos/
  • app_routes:/app/notebook/approvals/
  • app_routes:/app/notebook/field-guides/
  • app_routes:/app/notebook/agent-logs/
  • app_routes:/app/notebook/search/
  • Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections
  • Observed native contract: deadlines
  • Observed native contract: records
  • Observed native contract: pointguard
  • Observed native contract: web_boundary
  • App route: /app/notebook/notes/
  • App route: /app/notebook/field-guides/
  • App route: /app/notebook/approvals/
  • App route: /app/notebook/agent-logs/
  • App route: /app/pointguard/