Uncertainty marking — qualification

Record status

Record ID

job:socrates:uncertainty-marking

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

qualification

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Socrates

Owner role

University guide and tutor entity

Owner status

PROPOSED

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result

NOT RUN

Disposition

HELD

Reviewer

Not recorded

Receipt

Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Outcome definitions

Verified

All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

Failed

One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

Needs review

Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

Held

Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Proposed deterministic acceptance tests

Route-resolution and distinct-content checks apply only to the admitted canonical routes in this record. Held source-proposed extensions are non-resolving proposals and are excluded.

• A valid record contains a claim, scope, uncertainty label, source status, ownership, lifecycle, and revision identifier.
• The system rejects or holds a claim with no source reference when the claim is presented as source-backed.
• The system rejects invented primary-source metadata and preserves an explicit Unsupported or Unresolved state instead.
• Two conflicting supplied sources produce a Disputed or Unresolved label plus links to both sources and an explanation of the conflict.
• A claim marked Established-by-supplied-evidence cannot be used outside the recorded scope without a new review.
• Student identity data is optional, minimized, access-restricted, and excluded from public or broadly indexed contexts by default.
• High-stakes instruction, external enrollment, and published curriculum claims cannot reach Approved without a human reviewer receipt.
• Final messages remain drafts or Held; no provider, credential, enrollment, database, customer, or publication effect is asserted.
• Revision history preserves the prior claim, sources, labels, reviewer action, and reason for change.
• Keyboard navigation, visible focus, semantic labels, error text, and non-color-only status indicators are present for every form control.
• Screen-reader output names each uncertainty label, source status, review status, and failure reason.
• Search returns only records permitted by visibility and source partition rules; held private records are not exposed as public results.
• If a source cannot be opened or verified, the interface states that verification is unavailable and offers Hold, replace-source, or reviewer-escalation actions.

Negative and held-state tests

• Tutor output may be mistaken for institutional, academic, medical, legal, or enrollment authority.
• Generated recollection may be mistaken for evidence.
• A confidence score may imply unsupported mathematical precision.
• Disputed evidence may be collapsed into a single answer.
• Missing or inaccessible sources may be silently replaced by invented citations.
• Student identity or sensitive learning information may leak through notes, search, messages, or PointGuard context.
• A native route may be mistaken for a connected provider, publication system, or authoritative database.
• Deadline automation may create unintended external communication or enrollment effects.
• Accessibility failures may hide uncertainty labels, source conflicts, or Held states.
• Duplicate documentation pages could become doorway content or keyword-spam.

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after the stated evidence

• The proposal describes a bounded teaching and inquiry profile.
• The package can require source labels, uncertainty markers, revision history, and human review.
• The supplied source identifies Socrates as a proposed University guide and tutor entity.
• Local prototype or indexed surfaces may be named as intended review locations.

Still held

• Socrates is deployed, connected, or authoritative.
• Any provider, database, credential, enrollment, customer index, or publication workflow is connected.
• Claims have been qualified, verified, or approved in production.
• A curriculum, course route, primary-source packet, or citation tool is available as a live service.
• Student data is stored in protected production infrastructure.
• Any app route performs external sends, writes, publication, or enrollment.
• Qualification has completed for any individual claim.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• agents/index.html#socrates
• source_record:job:socrates:uncertainty-marking
• observed_native_contract.records
• observed_native_contract.pointguard
• observed_native_contract.web_boundary
• app_route:/app/notebook/notes/
• app_route:/app/notebook/approvals/
• app_route:/app/notebook/agent-logs/
• app_route:/app/notebook/search/
• app_route:/app/notebook/messages/