Independent review — forms

The distinct forms record for Independent review. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID: job:tilly:independent-review
Parent lifecycle: candidate
Page lane: package
Lane lifecycle: proposed
Owner: Tilly
Owner role: Pointguard and independent reviewer
Owner status: WORKING
Qualification result: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Proposed form sections

Each section is a candidate schema for inspectable records. Required-field presence does not establish factual truth.

Review brief

Define the review target, owner, scope, and requested decision without assuming authority.

review title
requesting agent or person
target record IDs
review question
scope included
scope excluded
owner of canonical source
requested completion date
priority
conflict-of-interest declaration

Evidence inventory

Record the evidence examined and preserve source provenance.

evidence record ID
source locator
source type
source SHA-256 if available
origin
revision
date examined
citation or attachment reference
evidence status
missing evidence

Checks and findings

Apply bounded review checks and distinguish findings from conclusions.

instrument or method checked
qualification requirement
claim examined
supporting receipt IDs
contradiction found
scope overrun
uncertainty or limitation
severity
recommended action
reviewer notes

Disposition and receipt

Document a recommendation while keeping publication, funding, credential, and source-change decisions with their owners.

recommendation: needs review, approved locally, or held
decision owner
decision deadline
conditions to proceed
unresolved questions
receipt summary
escalation target
reviewer sign-off
final publication status: held

Accessible state contract

Every field requires a visible and programmatic label.
Required and optional fields must be stated in text.
Invalid entries require an actionable message linked to the field.
Blocked and Held states remain visible without relying on color alone.

Supporting documentation fields

These fields come from the docs_urls lane and remain separate from the primary operating form.

Review intake

Define the review subject, owner, scope, and source boundary before inspecting evidence.

review title
subject record ID
requesting agent or person
reviewer ID
review scope
out-of-scope areas
source locator
source SHA-256 when available
review start date
target review date
visibility
linked PointGuard room

Evidence and claims

Map each material claim to its receipts and record gaps without converting drafts into public claims.

claim ID
claim text
claim status: draft, supported, contradicted, or held
supporting source IDs
source locator
receipt type
source revision
confidence note
contradiction note
missing evidence
recommended disposition

Qualification and instrument checks

Record reproducible checks of instruments and qualification criteria, including limitations and errata.

instrument slug
input fixture or test case
expected behavior
observed result
instrument status
test date
operator
qualification rule
failure or errata note
evidence attachment reference
retest required

Grant and publication gates

Separate grant preparation and public-claim routing from approval, funding, credential, and publication decisions.

grant or claim package ID
request type
decision owner
required approvals
funding commitment status
credential-access status
publication status
held reason
proposed next reviewer
receipt links
decision deadline

Review receipt

Close the review with a bounded conclusion and preserve the audit trail.

review outcome
supported claims
held claims
contradictions surfaced
unresolved questions
records created or revised
reviewer statement
handoff owner
handoff date
final receipt ID

Required or proposed record references

No record existence is asserted by this documentation page.

source-labelled review brief
instrument packet
qualification record
grant dossier
citation-check record
claim examination record
contradiction or gap record
review receipt
approval or hold decision
deadline and workback to-do
source-labelled evidence record
instrument work record
public-claim route record
approval record when a principal gate is reached

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

agents/index.html#tilly
source_record:job:tilly:independent-review
Observed native contract: PointGuard persistent cross-app context surface; specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners.
Observed native contract: Notebook records preserve canonical IDs, provenance, source locators, source SHA-256, revisions, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisions.
Observed native contract: Notebook approvals support Needs review, Approved, and Held states with receipts.
Observed native contract: current GuthHub routes are local prototypes or indexes; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are held.
observed_native_contract.records
observed_native_contract.pointguard
observed_native_contract.web_boundary
app:/app/pointguard/
app:/app/notebook/agent-logs/
app:/app/notebook/approvals/
app:/app/notebook/notes/
app:/app/notebook/files/
app:/app/notebook/field-guides/
app:/app/notebook/search/
allowed_instrument:checksum-verifier
allowed_instrument:binary-text-diff-similarity-ratio
allowed_instrument:url-query-string-parser