Instrument qualification — forms

The distinct forms record for Instrument qualification. This page is proposal-only.

Status: proposedLifecycle: candidate

Record status

Record ID: job:tilly:instrument-qualification
Parent lifecycle: candidate
Page lane: package
Lane lifecycle: proposed
Owner: Tilly
Owner role: Pointguard and independent reviewer
Owner status: WORKING
Qualification result: NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Agent jobs — builder overview — Inspect the package and stage a local project. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Proposed form sections

Each section is a candidate schema for inspectable records. Required-field presence does not establish factual truth.

Review scope

Define the instrument, requested decision, owner, and boundaries before evidence review.

instrument name and exact catalog slug
instrument source record ID
requesting agent or owner
review purpose
requested decision type
reviewer identity
independent-review declaration
conflicts or prior involvement
review due date

Evidence inputs

Collect source-labelled evidence without implying hidden uploads or connected providers.

source locator
source SHA-256
provenance description
source revision
catalog status
instrument inputs and assumptions
expected outputs
known limitations
attached local file references
related notes and records

Qualification checks

Record reproducible checks and whether evidence supports the intended use.

check ID
check description
test input
expected result
observed result
tolerance or pass rule
receipt or citation reference
qualification status
contradiction found
reviewer note

Claim examination

Test each proposed claim against receipts and prevent unsupported public language.

claim text
claim owner
claim scope
supporting receipt IDs
citation status
qualification dependency
overstatement risk
allowed wording
held wording
review outcome

Decision dossier

Assemble a reviewable package for qualification, grants, or public-claim routing.

decision summary
evidence index
open questions
failure conditions
recommended disposition
human approver
approval state
receipt links
revision note
next review date

Accessible state contract

Every field requires a visible and programmatic label.
Required and optional fields must be stated in text.
Invalid entries require an actionable message linked to the field.
Blocked and Held states remain visible without relying on color alone.

Supporting documentation fields

These fields come from the docs_urls lane and remain separate from the primary operating form.

Qualification request

Identify the instrument, requesting agent, intended use, and review boundary without implying a verified connection.

request ID
instrument name and exact catalog identifier
requesting agent
owner and source-record reference
intended use
requested review scope
review deadline
urgency
known constraints

Evidence packet

Capture traceable evidence and source provenance for the proposed qualification.

evidence item ID
source locator
source SHA-256 when available
evidence type
quoted or measured claim
collection date
collector
linked record ID
attachment or local file reference
revision

Qualification checks

Record reproducible checks and distinguish observed evidence from interpretation.

check ID
check description
method
inputs
expected result
observed result
status: pass/fail/needs-review
reproduction notes
citation check result
contradiction found
reviewer

Decision and boundaries

Make a bounded recommendation while preserving unresolved issues and Tilly's independence.

qualification status: proposed/qualified/held/rejected
decision rationale
open contradictions
unsupported claims
required remediation
principal gate affected
independent reviewer
approval status
receipt ID

Public-claim route

Prevent draft material from becoming a public claim without separate review.

candidate public claim
supporting evidence IDs
claim scope
allowed wording
held wording
publication gate
final reviewer
publication decision
decision timestamp

Required or proposed record references

No record existence is asserted by this documentation page.

Instrument source record with canonical ID, origin, source locator, source SHA-256, provenance, revision, lifecycle, tags, links, and attachments
Qualification record
Claim examination record
Citation-check record
Grant dossier
Public-claim review record
Contradiction or exception record
Review receipt
Human approval record
Instrument packet
Evidence and citation receipt
Contradiction record
Public-claim review
Approval receipt
Agent log entry

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

agents/index.html#tilly
source_record:job:tilly:instrument-qualification
Observed native contract: project_and_field_guide_collections
Observed native contract: deadlines
Observed native contract: records
Observed native contract: pointguard
App route: /app/pointguard/
App route: /app/notebook/field-guides/
App route: /app/notebook/agent-logs/
App route: /app/notebook/approvals/
App route: /app/notebook/notes/
App route: /app/notebook/files/
App route: /app/notebook/to-dos/
App route: /app/notebook/projects/
App route: /app/business/home/
source record: job:tilly:instrument-qualification
observed native contract: records preserve IDs, provenance, revisions, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisions
observed native contract: PointGuard is a persistent cross-app context surface and specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners
observed native contract: current GuthHub app routes are local prototypes or indexes and provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are held