Assurance preflight

Record status

Record ID

tool:assurance-preflight

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

contract

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Stan

Owner role

Chief Security and Engineering Officer

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Bounded contract

Proposal-only preflight for checking whether a requested security, engineering, operations, handoff, or gated action has sufficient authority, evidence, records, and review before any effect is taken. It identifies missing prerequisites and routes the request for confirmation; it does not execute remediation, deployment, credential changes, purchases, legal filings, or other consequential actions.

Owners

• Stan
• Chief Security and Engineering Officer

Inputs

• Requested action or handoff
• Relevant project or operational context
• Claimed authority and requesting principal
• Supporting records, receipts, implementation details, or evidence
• Applicable principal gate
• Proposed change, deployment, remediation, or escalation scope

Outputs

• Preflight assessment
• Required-prerequisite checklist
• Missing-evidence and missing-authority findings
• Gate classification
• Proposal-only next-step recommendation
• Explicit hold when authority, evidence, or permission is insufficient

Required or proposed record references

The list defines expected records; it does not assert that any record instance exists.

• Request description
• Requester identity and claimed authority
• Applicable gate: destructive remediation, money or purchasing, credential changes, public deployment, or legal filing
• Supporting receipts, approvals, implementation records, or handoff records
• Decision owner and escalation path
• Timestamp and status of the preflight

Route contract

The links below are this site's admitted canonical public records. Source-lane route suggestions are proposals only and are not represented as live or canonical until separately admitted.

Held source-proposed extensions

• /docs/assurance-preflight/contract: Defines the bounded purpose, inputs, outputs, owners, records, and non-execution boundary.
• /docs/assurance-preflight/gates: Explains how destructive remediation, money or purchasing, credential changes, public deployment, and legal filing requests are classified and held pending authority.
• /docs/assurance-preflight/hand-offs: Specifies receipt-backed handoff records, decision ownership, unresolved blockers, and escalation requirements.
• /docs/assurance-preflight/failure-states: Documents insufficient authority, missing evidence, ambiguous scope, conflicting instructions, and unverified implementation or deployment state.
• /docs/security-field-guides: explain assurance checks without manufacturing authority
• /docs/current-work-packets: define receipt-backed handoff contents
• /docs/principal-gates: distinguish gated contexts from ordinary proposals
• /docs/assurance-preflight/overview — explains scope, proposal-only status, observed versus proven facts, and the five principal gates.
• /docs/assurance-preflight/gates — defines separate decision rules for destructive remediation, money or purchasing, credential changes, public deployment, and legal filing.
• /docs/assurance-preflight/evidence-record — specifies the minimum receipt-backed record, source-reference format, reviewer fields, and unresolved-hazard handling.
• /docs/assurance-preflight/accessibility — documents keyboard, focus, labels, error messaging, contrast, zoom, reduced-motion, and non-color status requirements for the proposed documentation surface.
• /docs/assurance-preflight/privacy-abuse — defines data minimization, secret-handling, redaction, rate-limit, prompt-injection, destructive-request, and escalation checks.
• /docs/assurance-preflight/authority — explains how to distinguish named role context from demonstrated permission and how to hold requests lacking explicit authority.
• /docs/assurance-preflight/qualification-tests — gives deterministic fixtures, expected outcomes, and release-blocking criteria.
• /docs/assurance-preflight/source-ledger — lists the supplied source record and marks all unsupported implementation, connection, deployment, and authority claims as unproven.

These extension paths are not generated by this record and must not be treated as resolving routes.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:tool:assurance-preflight
• agents/index.html#stan