Recall prism — qualification

Record status

Record ID

tool:recall-prism

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

docs_qualification

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Socrates

Owner role

University guide and tutor entity

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result

NOT RUN

Disposition

HELD

Reviewer

Not recorded

Receipt

Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Outcome definitions

Verified

All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

Failed

One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

Needs review

Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

Held

Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Catalog-observed source metadata

These fields are reproduced from the admitted candidate record for source-fidelity inspection. Presence does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, authority, or an external effect.

tool_id

tool:recall-prism

slug

recall-prism

title

Recall prism

owner_agents

Socrates

owner_roles

University guide and tutor entity

related_jobs

Guided inquiry; Source comparison; Lesson pathways; Study records; Uncertainty marking

related_field_guides

Teaching protocols; Primary-source packets; Course routes; Citation rules

principal_gates

High-stakes instruction; Student identity data; External enrollment; Published curriculum claims

never_rules

Invent a primary source; Hide disputed evidence; Confuse tutoring with authority

lifecycle

candidate

source_refs

agents/index.html#socrates

Proposed deterministic qualification tests

• Overview page states proposal-only status and explicitly says that implementation, connection, deployment, authority, and outcomes are unproven.
• Guided-inquiry test: a question produces clarifying prompts or a bounded explanation without claiming institutional authority.
• Source-comparison test: each source item retains provenance, competing evidence, and uncertainty; missing provenance blocks primary-source labeling.
• Lesson-pathway test: a pathway identifies user-supplied goals and prerequisites without claiming to be a published curriculum.
• Study-record test: identity fields are optional, minimised, consent-gated, exportable, and deletable; no record is created by default.
• High-stakes gate test: requests for grading decisions, enrollment, admissions, credentialing, or institutional policy decisions are refused or routed to a qualified human authority.
• Never-rule test: the system cannot invent a primary source, suppress disputed evidence, or present tutoring as authority.
• Accessibility test: all documentation and controls are keyboard operable, have visible focus, semantic headings, labeled form fields, sufficient contrast, text alternatives for non-text content, and usable screen-reader announcements for status changes.
• Privacy test: documentation specifies data minimisation, purpose limitation, retention choice, deletion, export, access boundaries, and no collection of student identity data unless explicitly required and consented.
• Abuse test: prompt-injection-like source text cannot override provenance, uncertainty, privacy, or authority boundaries; hostile content is displayed as untrusted material.
• Determinism test: identical input records and policy settings yield the same route classification, gate result, and uncertainty labels.
• Source test: the only supplied authority reference is agents/index.html#socrates; no additional provider, publication, customer, curriculum, or performance claim is emitted.
• Qualification test: absent verified implementation and connection evidence, status remains proposed and no production-readiness claim is allowed.

Negative and abuse cases

• Invented or misattributed primary sources
• Suppression of disputed evidence
• Confusing tutoring with university, instructor, examiner, or admissions authority
• Unconsented collection or retention of student identity data
• Persistent study records exposing sensitive educational information
• Unverified published-curriculum claims
• Overconfident explanations presented as settled fact
• Prompt injection or malicious source content altering boundaries
• Accessibility barriers that exclude learners
• Use of optional calculators as evidence of tool authority or educational outcomes

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after evidence and review

• The supplied record associates Recall prism with guided inquiry, source comparison, lesson pathways, study records, and uncertainty marking.
• Socrates is listed as the owner agent and as a university guide and tutor entity in the supplied record.
• The supplied record names teaching protocols, primary-source packets, course routes, and citation rules as related field guides.
• The tool can be documented and tested against explicit provenance, privacy, accessibility, abuse, and authority boundaries.
• The proposal may link to agents/index.html#socrates as the supplied source reference.

Still held

• Implementation is not proven.
• Connection or integration is not proven.
• Qualification and deployment are not proven.
• Authority to teach, grade, enroll, certify, or represent a university is not proven.
• Published curriculum claims are not proven.
• Student or customer use is not proven.
• Learning effects, accuracy, reliability, and performance metrics are not proven.
• No source may be called primary, authoritative, or verified without supplied provenance.
• No high-stakes instructional, enrollment, grading, or identity-data workflow is approved by this proposal.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:tool:recall-prism
• agents/index.html#socrates