SwiftUI — qualification

Record status

Record ID

tool:swiftui

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

docs_qualification

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Tim

Owner role

Apple platform specialist

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Qualification status

Result

NOT RUN

Disposition

HELD

Reviewer

Not recorded

Receipt

Not recorded

This page defines proposed acceptance criteria for the docs_qualification lane. It does not execute tests, establish compliance, qualify the subject, or authorize an effect.

Outcome definitions

Verified

All stated evidence and acceptance requirements passed for the exact reviewed revision; this still does not authorize deployment or an external effect.

Failed

One or more deterministic acceptance requirements failed with an inspectable reason.

Needs review

Evidence or interpretation is incomplete, conflicting, or awaits an identified human reviewer.

Held

Authority, required evidence, safe execution conditions, or a principal gate is absent.

The current record remains NOT RUN / HELD. These definitions describe candidate outcomes only.

Catalog-observed source metadata

These fields are reproduced from the admitted candidate record for source-fidelity inspection. Presence does not prove implementation, connection, qualification, authority, or an external effect.

tool_id

tool:swiftui

slug

swiftui

title

SwiftUI

owner_agents

Tim

owner_roles

Apple platform specialist

related_jobs

Swift and SwiftUI implementation; Apple platform discovery; App Intents and Spotlight; Cross-device product families; Native capability qualification

related_field_guides

iOS 27; iPadOS 27; macOS 27; Liquid Glass; Apple capability index

principal_gates

New entitlements; Store submission; Production credentials; Scope outside authorized Apple files

never_rules

Race another writer; Claim an unavailable API; Publish or submit without approval

lifecycle

candidate

source_refs

agents/index.html#tim

Proposed deterministic qualification tests

• AT-01 Identity: every page names tool_id tool:swiftui, slug swiftui, title SwiftUI, owner Tim, and source reference agents/index.html#tim.
• AT-02 Proposal boundary: pages state that implementation, connection, API availability, entitlements, credentials, deployment, and publication authority are unproven unless separately evidenced.
• AT-03 Route distinctness: each documentation route contains route-specific fields and tests; no route is a duplicate alias of another route.
• AT-04 Platform separation: iOS 27, iPadOS 27, and macOS 27 appear as separate review dimensions, with unknown or unsupported claims held rather than inferred.
• AT-05 API claim discipline: an API or capability cannot be marked available without a supplied source or verification record; otherwise the result is unverified or held.
• AT-06 Entitlement gate: any new entitlement produces a blocking status until authorization and approval evidence are recorded.
• AT-07 Release gate: store submission and production credentials remain blocked until explicit approval is recorded.
• AT-08 Scope gate: a request naming files outside the authorized Apple-file boundary fails qualification and is marked held.
• AT-09 Never-rule compliance: no workflow step races another writer, claims an unavailable API, publishes or submits without approval, or expands beyond authorized Apple files.
• AT-10 Accessibility: each interactive example has a keyboard/focus path where applicable, accessible names, logical focus order, Dynamic Type review, VoiceOver review, contrast evidence where applicable, reduced-motion behavior where applicable, and non-color status communication.
• AT-11 Privacy: every data item has purpose, collection point, storage location, indexing or Spotlight exposure, retention, deletion behavior, and logging classification; unknown fields fail privacy qualification.
• AT-12 Abuse: test requests for unauthorized entitlement use, credential exfiltration, deceptive permission prompts, hidden tracking, unsafe automation, and unsupported platform assumptions; each must be rejected or held.
• AT-13 Source traceability: every normative claim links to a supplied source or is explicitly labeled proposed/unverified; the only supplied source reference is agents/index.html#tim.
• AT-14 Authority: reviewer identity, approval scope, timestamp, and decision are required before any qualified-for-review result becomes publishable.
• AT-15 Evidence integrity: archived qualification artifacts may be checksum-verified, but checksum success must not be treated as proof of API availability, authorship, or authority.
• AT-16 Failure determinism: missing evidence, contradictory platform claims, unavailable API claims, scope violations, privacy gaps, accessibility failures, abuse findings, or absent approval produce held or rejected status rather than a pass.

Negative and abuse cases

• Treating the catalog observation as proof that a working SwiftUI tool or implementation exists.
• Inventing Apple APIs, deployment behavior, Liquid Glass behavior, App Intents support, Spotlight integration, or cross-device effects.
• Assuming iOS 27, iPadOS 27, or macOS 27 availability without supplied evidence.
• Requesting or using new entitlements without approval.
• Using production credentials or attempting store submission without authorization.
• Publishing documentation that implies implementation, connection, qualification, or authority has been established.
• Expanding beyond authorized Apple files or repository boundaries.
• Exposing private user data through App Intents, Spotlight, logs, analytics, previews, or examples.
• Creating inaccessible controls, focus traps, unreadable contrast, motion hazards, or color-only status indicators.
• Enabling deceptive permission prompts, unsafe automation, privilege escalation, or credential collection.
• Relying on a calculator or integrity check as a substitute for platform documentation, review, or authority.

Qualification claim boundary

Potentially allowed only after evidence and review

• The agent catalog contains an observed entry named SwiftUI with tool_id tool:swiftui and slug swiftui.
• Tim is listed as the owner and Apple platform specialist.
• The source record associates the entry with Swift and SwiftUI implementation, Apple platform discovery, App Intents and Spotlight, cross-device product families, and native capability qualification.
• The source record lists iOS 27, iPadOS 27, macOS 27, Liquid Glass, and Apple capability index as related field guides.
• The source record identifies new entitlements, store submission, production credentials, and scope outside authorized Apple files as principal gates.
• The source record supplies the never-rules: race no other writer, claim no unavailable API, publish or submit only with approval.
• The documentation and tests proposed here can preserve uncertainty, record evidence, and gate release decisions.

Still held

• That a SwiftUI implementation exists or is connected.
• That any Apple API, App Intent, Spotlight integration, Liquid Glass feature, or platform capability is available.
• That the tool can compile, run, deploy, sign, submit to a store, or access production credentials.
• That Tim or any listed owner has authority to approve publication, entitlements, credentials, or store submission.
• That the related field guides are current, authoritative, or sufficient for qualification.
• That any documentation route proves runtime accessibility, privacy compliance, security, safety, or platform conformance.
• That the compatible instruments validate SwiftUI behavior or Apple authority.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:tool:swiftui
• agents/index.html#tim