Page actions
field guide / candidate
Instrument packets — related jobs
The distinct related jobs record for Instrument packets. This page is proposal-only.
Record status
- Record ID
- field-guide:instrument-packets
- Parent lifecycle
- candidate
- Page lane
- plan
- Lane lifecycle
- proposed
- Owner
- Tilly
- Owner role
- Not separately recorded
- Owner status
- Not separately recorded
- Qualification result
- NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review
Working browser surface: Field guides — documentation — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.
Related Agent job handoffs
Handoff record requirements
The guide may supply evidence, checkpoints, and failure context to a job. The receiving job retains ownership and must record its own decision, approval, and receipt.
- source record for the instrument packet
- instrument record with exact allowed slug
- source locator and source SHA-256
- provenance and revision record
- evidence receipt
- review decision record
- linked job or field-guide membership record
- deadline or follow-up to-do where review remains open
- source-labelled instrument record
- evidence note
- file reference or source locator
- review to-do
- approval receipt
- revision history
Ownership boundary
The guide supports these jobs without importing their package descriptions, becoming the job owner, or gaining independent authority.
- A directory name or native route may be mistaken for a connected production feature.
- Selecting a slug by approximate name can create an invalid or unverified instrument reference.
- VERIFIED_WITH_ERRATA instruments may be used without recording their limitations.
- Checksum or similarity results may be overstated as proof of source authority or publication.
- Duplicate evidence may be reconciled by deletion, destroying provenance and review history.
- A local Approved state may be misrepresented as production qualification or external authorization.
- Unresolved grant, website, customer, provider, credential, database, or publication claims may leak into public copy.
- Hidden uploads, protected storage, external sends, and provider writes may be implied by interface labels.
- Accessibility review may be reduced to contrast alone and incorrectly treated as complete conformance.
- Medical, financial, engineering, or other domain instruments may be presented as individualized advice or professional certification.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
source_record:field-guide:instrument-packetsagents/index.html#tillyfield-guide:instrument-packetsOBSERVED_NATIVE_CONTRACTALLOWED_INSTRUMENTSObserved native contract: records preserve canonical IDs, source locators, source SHA-256, provenance, revision, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisions.Observed native contract: PointGuard is a persistent cross-app context surface while specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners.Observed native contract: current GuthHub app routes are local prototypes or indexes and provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are held.Allowed instrument directory entries: checksum-verifier; sha-256-hash-function-demo; date-duration-calculator.