Page actions
field guide / candidate
Public-claim routes — related jobs
The distinct related jobs record for Public-claim routes. This page is proposal-only.
Record status
- Record ID
- field-guide:public-claim-routes
- Parent lifecycle
- candidate
- Page lane
- plan
- Lane lifecycle
- proposed
- Owner
- Tilly
- Owner role
- Not separately recorded
- Owner status
- Not separately recorded
- Qualification result
- NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review
Working browser surface: Field guides — documentation — Inspect the guide and persist local checkpoints. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.
Related Agent job handoffs
Handoff record requirements
The guide may supply evidence, checkpoints, and failure context to a job. The receiving job retains ownership and must record its own decision, approval, and receipt.
- Source claim record with canonical ID, origin, locator, source SHA-256, provenance, revision, lifecycle, tags, links, and attachments
- Evidence record linked to each claim
- Claim-review to-do with dueAt, priority, completion state, tags, and revisions
- Approval record marked Needs review, Approved, or Held
- Draft message or document record for any proposed outward communication
- Agent log receipt recording authority boundaries and current state
- source-bound claim record
- evidence record with source locator and SHA-256
- independent review record
- instrument qualification record
- approval or hold receipt
- draft public copy record
- deadline todo
Ownership boundary
The guide supports these jobs without importing their package descriptions, becoming the job owner, or gaining independent authority.
- A source locator, hash, provenance value, or revision may be absent or stale.
- A claim may exceed what its evidence supports or conflate a named native surface with a connected web feature.
- Conflicting evidence may be hidden by premature wording or unrecorded reconciliation.
- An instrument may be incorrectly treated as an approval, qualification, live lookup, or production dependency.
- Prototype or indexed routes may be mistaken for deployed capabilities or authoritative customer records.
- Draft messages, exports, uploads, and publication actions may create unintended external effects.
- Private evidence may be exposed through public-facing wording or search.
- Missing deadlines, owners, or receipts may make a review appear complete when it is not.
- Accessibility omissions may prevent reviewers from detecting Held or Needs review states.
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
source_record:field-guide:public-claim-routesagents/index.html#tillyObserved native contract: project_and_field_guide_collectionsObserved native contract: deadlinesObserved native contract: recordsObserved native contract: pointguardApp route: /app/notebook/field-guides/App route: /app/notebook/notes/App route: /app/notebook/files/App route: /app/notebook/to-dos/App route: /app/notebook/approvals/App route: /app/notebook/agent-logs/App route: /app/pointguard//app/notebook/field-guides//app/notebook/approvals//app/notebook/search//app/notebook/agent-logs/Observed native contract: records preserve canonical IDs, source locators, source SHA-256, provenance, revision, lifecycle, tags, links, attachments, and record revisions.Observed native contract: PointGuard is a persistent cross-app context surface while specialist apps remain execution and canonical-record owners.Observed native contract: current GuthHub routes are local prototypes or indexes and provider, credential, database, customer, publication, and production effects are held.