Page actions
instrument / verified-clean
Battery Charge Time Estimator
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
Inspectable records
Ledger state
The current ledger marks this instrument verified clean within the source-bound verification corpus.
- Area
- Electrical & Electronics Engineering — Circuits, Power Systems, Electronics Lab
- Tranche
- tranche-4
- Evidence ID
- t4-138
- Ledger rows
- 1
No ledger note is attached.
Review findings
The core arithmetic is appropriate for a rough CC estimate, but the specification needs explicit unit conventions and an explicit percentage-to-fraction conversion before implementation. The verdict is NEEDS_REVIEW because those ambiguities can materially change the output.
Formula and scope findings
- The formula is standard for a rough constant-current estimate only when efficiency is a dimensionless fraction. Because the input is specified as efficiency %, the implementation must convert it as efficiency_fraction = efficiency_percent / 100; using the percentage value directly produces a 100-fold error.
- The formula does not explicitly define capacity and charger-current units, so the result unit is ambiguous unless capacity is in Ah and current is in A, or equivalent units are consistently used.
- The CC-CV taper is mentioned but not modeled; therefore the result is not a full battery charge-time calculation and will generally underestimate actual time.
Unit assumptions
- Capacity is in ampere-hours (Ah) and charger current is in amperes (A), producing time in hours.
- Capacity and current may use other matching prefixes, such as mAh and mA, because their ratio remains in hours; mixed units require conversion first.
- Efficiency input is a percentage from greater than 0% through 100%, converted to a fraction by dividing by 100.
- The charger current is treated as a constant effective current during the modeled charging interval.
Boundary hardening
BREAK_CLAIMED · SELF_FLAGGED
A zero charging current produces an undefined division-by-zero result, and the CC-CV note describes a second regime without supplying a CV taper formula or data needed to calculate it. Negative-current handling is also unspecified and can produce a nonsensical negative time if applied literally.
Errata and corrections
No applied erratum is attached to this unique-name record.
Inspectable example
4 review vectors are recorded. One source-bound sample is shown below.
{
"inputs": {
"capacity_Ah": 2.4,
"charge_current_A": 1.5,
"efficiency_percent": 90
},
"expected_outputs": {
"estimated_charge_time_hours": 1.77777778
},
"working": "efficiency_fraction = 90 / 100 = 0.90; base_time = 2.4 Ah / 1.5 A = 1.6 h; estimated_time = 1.6 h × (1 / 0.90) = 1.6 / 0.90 = 1.77777778 h."
}Related workflows
Sources and evidence
These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.
VERIFIED_LEDGER.json · VERIFIED_CLEANevidence-tranche4/tranche4-results.jsonBOUNDARY_HAZARD_CATALOG.json