Experiment run

Record status

Record ID

project:experiment-run

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

catalog overview

Lane lifecycle

candidate

Owner

Not separately recorded

Owner role

Not separately recorded

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Project templates & workflows — overview — Create a local project from this template and validate its forms. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Purpose and audience

Proposal-only project record for defining an experiment protocol, controls, fixtures, runs, failures, interpretation, evidence, approvals, and closure receipts without implying execution, provider connection, publication, or production state.

• experiment owner
• protocol reviewer
• operator
• evidence reviewer
• approver

Required or proposed record references

The list defines expected record classes. It does not assert that any instance exists.

• project record
• protocol note
• scope decision record
• milestone to-dos
• deadline and workback records
• dependency records
• owner assignments
• fixture or setup record
• run records
• failure and deviation records
• evidence records
• interpretation note
• approval records
• risk register
• closure receipt

Route contract

The links below are this site's admitted canonical public records. Source-lane route suggestions are proposals only and are not represented as live or canonical until separately admitted.

Held source-proposed extensions

• /docs/projects/experiment-run/overview
• /docs/projects/experiment-run/protocol-and-controls
• /docs/projects/experiment-run/runs-and-failures
• /docs/projects/experiment-run/receipts-and-review

These extension paths are not generated by this record and must not be treated as resolving routes.

Public claim boundary

Allowed items below are source-lane proposals, not verified current-state claims.

Candidate claims allowed after source review

• This is a proposal for a project and form structure.
• The record distinguishes protocol, runs, failures, evidence, interpretation, approvals, risks, and closure.
• The design includes explicit deadlines, workbacks, dependencies, owners, revisions, and human review.
• The supplied native contract includes project collections, deadline payloads, provenance fields, and prototype or indexed app routes.

Claims held

• That an experiment was executed or completed.
• That any provider, credential, database, customer, publication, export, upload, or production connection exists.
• That a result is valid, statistically significant, reproducible, safe, or qualified without reviewed evidence.
• That any route is a connected web feature or canonical backend.
• That an approval, deadline completion, evidence review, or closure occurred without its preserved receipt.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:project:experiment-run
• NotebookCollectionKind.project
• NotebookTodoPayload.dueAt
• Notebook Agenda deadlines/workbacks
• Notebook records provenance and revisions
• PointGuard persistent cross-app context surface
• /app/notebook/projects/
• /app/notebook/to-dos/
• /app/notebook/agenda/
• /app/notebook/approvals/
• /app/notebook/files/
• /app/notebook/capture/
• /app/notebook/agent-logs/
• APP_ROUTES /app/notebook/projects/
• APP_ROUTES /app/notebook/agenda/
• APP_ROUTES /app/notebook/approvals/
• APP_ROUTES /app/pointguard/
• ALLOWED_INSTRUMENTS:scientific-calculator
• ALLOWED_INSTRUMENTS:statistics-suite-descriptive-stats
• ALLOWED_INSTRUMENTS:date-duration-calculator
• PointGuard specialist-app ownership and held external effects