Instrument catalog

Record status

Record ID

tool:instrument-catalog

Parent lifecycle

candidate

Page lane

contract

Lane lifecycle

proposed

Owner

Tilly

Owner role

Pointguard and independent reviewer

Owner status

Not separately recorded

Qualification result

NOT RUN · held for evidence and human review

Working browser surface: Tools — overview — Inspect the tool contract, usage, boundaries, and proposed qualification checks. This route is local-only; provider, credential, database, customer, publication, deployment, and production effects remain held.

Bounded contract

Proposal-only catalog for organizing instrument entries, qualification status, evidence reconciliation, and review routes. It may support independent review, instrument qualification, grant research and drafts, website claim review, and related field-guide packets, but the catalog's implementation, connection, deployment, and authority are not proven. It cannot approve publication, funding, credential access, or changes to another agent's source.

Owners

• Tilly
• Pointguard and independent reviewer

Inputs

• Instrument identifiers and descriptions supplied by an authorized source
• Qualification records and evidence packets
• Contradictions or evidence discrepancies for reconciliation
• Grant research and draft materials
• Website claim-review materials
• Requested field-guide or documentation route

Outputs

• Proposal-only catalog entries
• Instrument-to-use compatibility mappings using only exact supplied slugs
• Qualification and evidence-reconciliation work items
• Independent-review packets
• Grant-research and draft references
• Website claim-review findings
• Explicitly unresolved contradictions and held claims

Required or proposed record references

The list defines expected records; it does not assert that any record instance exists.

• Instrument identity and exact supplied slug
• Source reference for each catalog entry
• Qualification status, if supplied
• Evidence packet or instrument packet
• Reviewer identity and review role
• Contradiction or discrepancy record
• Decision or disposition record
• Claim status distinguishing draft, held, and public claim
• Change-request record for any requested source modification

Route contract

The links below are this site's admitted canonical public records. Source-lane route suggestions are proposals only and are not represented as live or canonical until separately admitted.

Held source-proposed extensions

• /docs/instrument-packets: Define the fields, provenance requirements, limitations, and review status for each cataloged instrument.
• /docs/qualification-records: Explain how qualification evidence, reviewer identity, contradictions, and dispositions are recorded without implying deployment.
• /docs/grant-dossiers: Provide a draft-only structure for linking instrument descriptions and evidence to grant research.
• /docs/public-claim-routes: Separate website claim review from final publication and document the hold boundary for unsupported claims.
• /docs/instrument-packets — Explain what an instrument packet contains and how it is submitted for review.
• /docs/qualification-records — Explain qualification evidence, reviewer separation, and contradiction handling.
• /docs/grant-dossiers — Explain how catalog records support grant research and drafts without converting drafts into claims.
• /docs/public-claim-routes — Explain the review path for website claims and the prohibition on publishing unsupported drafts.
• /docs/instrument-catalog/identity — states the observed tool ID, slug, title, owner, roles, jobs, gates, never-rules, and source reference.
• /docs/instrument-catalog/scope-and-nonclaims — distinguishes observed catalog metadata from unproven implementation, connection, qualification, deployment, and authority.
• /docs/instrument-catalog/directory-reconciliation — lists every referenced instrument by exact allowed slug, supplied name, area, and supplied status; rejects aliases and invented entries.
• /docs/instrument-catalog/qualification-records — defines the immutable test-record schema, pass/fail rules, reviewer identity, timestamps, and contradiction handling.
• /docs/instrument-catalog/accessibility — documents keyboard-only traversal, focus visibility, semantic headings, labels, error announcements, contrast, zoom/reflow, reduced motion, and screen-reader checks.
• /docs/instrument-catalog/privacy — records submitted fields, retention, local-versus-remote processing evidence, logging behavior, export/deletion behavior, and unknowns.
• /docs/instrument-catalog/abuse-controls — tests prompt or input abuse, oversized payloads, enumeration, misleading claims, credential requests, and attempts to bypass review gates.
• /docs/instrument-catalog/source-ledger — maps each claim to a supplied source reference or marks it unverified; no external source is implied.
• /docs/instrument-catalog/authority-and-gates — tests final-publication, funding, credential, and cross-agent source-change authority boundaries.
• /docs/instrument-catalog/review-and-release — explains independent review, failed-test disposition, held claims, and release blocking.

These extension paths are not generated by this record and must not be treated as resolving routes.

Sources and evidence

These pointers bind the page to evidence. They do not grant authority or collapse verification into deployment.

• source_record:tool:instrument-catalog
• agents/index.html#tilly